NOTE:
You've come to an old part of SW Online. We're still moving this and other older stories into our new format. In the meanwhile, click here to go to the current home page.








WHICH SIDE ARE YOU ON?
Immigrant rights supporters take to the streets
The making of a new movement

By Sharon Smith | March 17, 2006 | Page 5

THE MOVEMENT for immigrants' rights took an enormous leap forward last Friday. As many as 300,000 demonstrators, overwhelmingly Mexican-Americans, jammed Chicago's streets--in the middle of a workday.

This massive turnout reached far beyond the activist community because local Spanish-language radio hosts urged listeners to attend. And this breathtaking show of strength instantly marginalized the anti-immigrant Minutemen movement, able to summon only a handful of counterprotesters.

The March 10 protest is part of a burgeoning movement that could recast the national debate on immigration--while tapping the power of immigrants as an integral component of the U.S. working class.

Until now, labor journalist David Bacon noted, "Congress is divided between the supposed 'conservatives' who want to stop immigration and turn the undocumented into criminals, and the 'liberals' who want to give employers new guest worker programs."

The ominously titled "Border Protection, Antiterrorism and Illegal Immigration Control Act" (HR 4437) swept through the House in December, criminalizing undocumented immigrants and anyone--from nurses and doctors to social workers--who provides them any assistance. The bill also mandates the construction of a 700-mile wall along the U.S.-Mexico border.

Not to be outdone, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist has called for "physical or electronic barriers covering every inch of our 1,951-mile border with Mexico," while declaring that illegal immigration poses a "dangerous national security threat."

Democrats have recently begun posturing as opponents of HR 4437. Sen. Hillary Clinton--who told WABC radio in 2003, "I am, you know, adamantly against illegal immigrants"--mustered a tepid sound bite against the bill, calling it "an unworkable scheme to try to deport 11 million people, which you have to have a police state to try to do." But she added that she stands for "strengthening our borders in order to make us safer from the threat of terrorism."

Sens. John McCain and Ted Kennedy proposed their own "Secure America and Orderly Immigration Act of 2005," with a guest worker program not unlike President Bush's own initiative, offering the prospect of certain deportation when immigrants' temporary contracts expire.

Some liberal commentators regard undocumented immigrants as a scourge on U.S. workers--creating the potential for dangerous alliances. Thom Hartmann, a frequent contributor to CommonDreams.org, asked recently, "How can progressives join with the few remaining populist Republicans (like Lou Dobbs and Patrick Buchanan) to forge an alliance to make [opposing illegal immigration] an all-American effort?"

But immigrant workers weaken the bargaining power of organized labor only when they are excluded from the legal right to bargain collectively. Neither Republicans nor Democrats support that right.

Already, the number of immigrants in unions grew 23 percent between 1996 and 2003, at a time when overall union membership has been in steep decline. Immigrant workers make up two-thirds of the members in the Service Employees Industrial Union (SEIU).

The strike weapon is also beginning to re-emerge in this struggle, after decades of virtual absence on U.S. soil.

On February 14, organizers of rallies in Philadelphia and southern Delaware used the slogan "A Day Without an Immigrant" to call on immigrants to stay home from work to highlight the importance of their labor to the economy. Two-thirds of Perdue Farm's workers in Georgetown, Del., didn't report to work on February 14--and both rallies drew 1,500.

Following suit, Chicago organizers called for a "general strike" among immigrant workers and students on March 10, and tens of thousands complied by walking out at noon. Construction workers still wearing hardhats joined restaurant workers, factory workers and high school students, marching alongside workers from hundreds of immigrant-owned small businesses, while entire families marched with babies and grandparents in tow.

Many carried American flags alongside Mexican flags. But the Americans flags did not imply unadulterated patriotism, as one handmade sign stapled to an American flag made clear--asking, "Land of the free?" Another read, "My Mexican son died in Iraq." And the march's overriding message was, "We are workers, not terrorists."

Perhaps most significantly, the dominant chant at the March 10 protest, "Si se puede!" ("Yes we can!"), suddenly seemed realistic in this flowering of humanity.

Home page | Current storylist | Back to the top