Pure propaganda for the warrior police
Are U.S. police departments responding to a real threat with their ramped-up militarization? Worth Fighting For: An Army Ranger's Journey Out of the Military and Across America, explains why he doesn't think so, in an article written for Truth-out., a former U.S. Army Ranger and author of the forthcoming
CNN RECENTLY aired a hopelessly biased and myopic segment on the Erin Burnett Show--a report that can only be described as propaganda for the U.S. police state. The video, still available on CNN's website, is titled "How a 1997 bank robbery led to police militarization."
Kyung Lah--sounding like a voice actor introducing the trailer for a Hollywood blockbuster--begins her report with these words: "Shooting at everyone, dressed for war, outside a Bank of America in North Hollywood in 1997--this is what retired police officer John Caprarelli faced, armed only with his 9 mm handgun."
Cut to a recording from police responding to the robbery in 1997, "They have automatic weapons! There is nothing we can do that can stop them!"
Lah follows up with shock and exasperation, "Hundreds outgunned by just two. [Police officers] even borrowed rifles from a nearby gun shop!"
Cut back to Caprarelli, with slinking shoulders, meek eyes and a cracking voice: "We were a bunch of Davids and they were two Goliaths"--referring to the entire North Hollywood police force, which had helicopters, shotguns and dogs at the scene, versus the so-called Goliaths.
According to Lah, this incident "stunned" police departments across the country and caused those departments to seek out high-powered rifles and military gear.
The CNN report continues with a reference to a study by the ACLU showing that the Department of Defense transferred $1 million in military equipment to local and state police in 1990. By 2013, that number had jumped to almost a half a billion dollars. We're fed these numbers with stills from the 1997 robbery in the background and led to believe that nothing happened between 1990 and 2013 that would explain the militarization of the police by the Department of Defense, except this incident in 1997.
Never mind that we have to go all the way back to 1997 to find such a shootout between armed robbers and police. Or that violent crime is at a 40-year low in the US. Or that in 2013, 30 cops were shot and killed in the US--just a fraction of the 9,000 or so murders using guns that happen each year and an even smaller fraction of the 461,000 sworn officers that walk the streets in the U.S.
This report by CNN is misleading in that it fails to show that the police force by nature is a militarized institution. However, this doesn't mean it hasn't become more militarized in time. To expose the red herring that is this CNN report, we need to go back to the origins of the first police departments, which were invented between 1825 and 1855 in the U.S. and England.
POLICE DEPARTMENTS were created for different reasons, depending on the region, according to Radley Balko, author of Rise of the Warrior Cop. In the South, police were created to control African Americans in towns like Charleston, S.C., where they worked in textile mills. Blacks, whose wages were sent to their slave master, lived together in cordoned-off areas of the city--and constituted a constant threat of insurrection because they lived in concentrated areas under unjust conditions.
The police were created in 1840 in New York City following the attempt of local journeymen to demand the 10-hour workday and the subsequent creation of a general trade union in 1830. Workers were fed up with unemployment, exploitation in the workplace, and bosses pitting Blacks and immigrants against white U.S.-born workers. "Workers began to organize and march into rich neighborhoods and threaten the elite of the city," according to historian David Whitehouse.
The city's wealthiest were feeling threatened by organized and unorganized groups of workers and unemployed. The police were created to quell the unrest and protect the wealth disparity that existed in the city. The new police force would be a full-time job, with 24-hour shifts and a defined structure.
The first official police force was created in 1829 in England, also to put down factory strikes and angry displaced workers. The first supervising justice of the police force in London was a retired colonel. As Balko says in Rise of the Warrior Cop, this set the precedent for a "military-like, top-down structure, and even borrowed some military titles." It was this model that was adopted by U.S. police forces.
The military had only two options: shoot or not shoot. There was no arresting when the military came into break up strikes or disperse an angry mob. When the army did fire, it would create martyrs among the cause of the angry and exploited workers. The police force had to carry nearly the same armed might as the military, but it had to play things different. Patrols began, where police would get used to inflicting non-lethal violence on the local population. W
Which is certainly not to say lethal force wasn't or isn't used: the police killed 410 people in the U.S. in 2012. And Blacks are twice as likely to be killed by the police as whites. In times of strikes and mass action, the toughest and most brutal police would be on the front lines to break up the strike, always taking orders from higher-ups, just as in the military.
As we are seeing in Ferguson, the police also exist to combat the racial unrest, which is a necessary outcome of exploiting labor. If Blacks can be paid less or be prevented from working because of racism, then white workers have to compete against lower-wage workers, which drives all wages down--increasing profits and power for the owners.
"You have to have something to combat what is thrown at you," says Caprarelli, near the conclusion of the CNN report.
Right now, in Ferguson, police officers are on the receiving end of peaceful chants and raised hands. And it is these weapons the police were created to disarm. So they respond with military-like intimidation, using military-grade weapons. The police are the last line of defense for this horribly racist and materially unequal society.
Isolating this one incident in 1997 as the cause for the out-of-control militarized police forces in the US might be written off as bad reporting, or something to ignore, but it is a seed of misinformation that should be snuffed out.
It is worth noting that both of the armed robbers were killed at the scene in the North Hollywood robbery in 1997. Not one of the hundreds of officers at the scene was killed. The many Davids miraculously took down the two Goliaths, despite the Davids' primitive weapons.
First published at Truth-out.