Subject: [SocialistWorker.org] Operation Enduring Failure
-----
View original article here:
http://socialistworker.org/2011/10/24/operation-enduring-failure
Comment: Eamonn McCann
======== OPERATION ENDURING FAILURE ==========================================
/Belfast Daily Telegraph/ columnist Eamonn McCann draws up a balance sheet of
the West's war in Afghanistan--and finds nothing for the plus side.
October 24, 2011
SO WHO are you going to believe, then: the svelte dude at the White House
podium or the grimy character preaching from a hut in the Hindu Kush? Barack
Obama or Zabihullah Mujahid?
On October 7, Obama declared that "our citizens are safer and our nation is
more secure" as a result of 10 years of the Afghan war, which his
administration was now "responsibly ending...from a position of strength."
In a message delivered to Reuters the same day, Mujahid took a different
view: "Even with scarce weapons and equipment, [we have] forced the
occupiers, who intended to stay forever, to rethink their position. If we
hold tightly on to the rope of Allah, our enemy will be forced to leave our
country completely."
"Rope of Allah" falls strangely on the ears. A problem in translation,
perhaps. But no problem deciding which of the two leaders offered the more
accurate assessment.
Nor is there any reason to believe that the streets of Western cities are now
safer. The July 7 bombing in London was perpetrated in 2005--four years after
the invasion of Afghanistan. One of the bombers, Shehaz Tanweer, left a
"suicide video" explicitly citing the presence of British troops in
Afghanistan as justification for the massacre he was about to inflict.
None of the 19 September 11 hijackers had come from Afghanistan. All but one
were Saudis. Obama has just concluded the biggest arms deal in history with
the Saudi dictatorship.
The man whom NATO governments have pinned their hopes on, Hamid Karzai, was
described in diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks as "paranoid," "weak"
and with "an inability to grasp the most rudimentary principles of
state-building." His government, holed up in a palace in Kabul, is rated the
fourth-most corrupt in the world.
In the latest polls, 60 percent of the British people are against the war, 31
percent are in favor, 9 percent don't know. A total of 73 percent of
Americans tell pollsters that they want the troops withdrawn, as soon as
possible.
There is no democratic mandate for the war and no reason for hope that it
will attain its objectives, whatever those are these days.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
THE LIBERATION of women once ranked high on the list of war aims. But there
wasn't a word about that, much less a reckoning of progress on the issue, in
Obama's address. Nor, naturally, a cheep from Bush's chief satrap in the
drive to war, Tony Blair.
The latest indication of the position of women can be found in the Karzai
administration's decision to bring domestic violence centers, of which there
are only 14 in the country, under government control, with a new rule banning
women suspected of "moral crimes" from admission. The moral crimes mentioned
include running away from a husband.
Malalai Joya, an Afghan writer who served as a member of parliament from the
first election in 2003 until 2006, when she was thrown out for persistence in
raising the plight of women, agrees that a minority of better-off women in
Kabul has better conditions.
But for the vast majority, little has changed: "The U.S. replaced the
barbaric Taliban with the brutal Northern Alliance...The situation for women
is as catastrophic as it was before. In most provinces, women's lives are
hell. Forced marriages, child brides and domestic violence are very common.
Self-immolation is at a peak."
Joya describes the stated commitment to women's rights at the time of the
invasion as: "All lies...Dust in the eyes of the world."
None of the liberationists at the Labour Party's annual conference at the end
of September thought this worth a syllable of platform time.
The United Nations, in the name of which the war is being waged, estimates
that 1,462 civilians perished in the conflict in the first six months of this
year; many murdered by the Taliban and its tribal allies, many others by the
U.S. and its tribal allies and by drones operated from the safety of an Air
Force base in Nevada. This represents a 15 percent increase on the first six
months of last year.
Fatal British casualties have reached 342. Their average age has been 22.
Twenty-eight were teenagers.
After 10 years of war, neither the U.S. nor British government has been able
to point to a single significant achievement. George Bush gave the Afghan war
the codename Operation Enduring Freedom. Today, it's Operation Enduring
Failure.
Time to bring the troops home.
/First published in the/ Belfast Telegraph [1].
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Published by the International Socialist Organization. Material on this Web
site is licensed by SocialistWorker.org, under a Creative Commons (by-nc-nd
3.0) license, except for articles that are republished with permission.
Readers are welcome to share and use material belonging to this site for
non-commercial purposes, as long as they are attributed to the author and
SocialistWorker.org.
[1] http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/opinion/columnists/eamon-mccann/womens-rights-the-first-casualty-of-afghan-fiasco-16062118.html
