Subject: [SocialistWorker.org] How the Cheyenne beat big coal
-----
View original article here:
http://socialistworker.org/2012/07/06/how-the-cheyenne-beat-big-coal
Comment: Brian Ward
======== HOW THE CHEYENNE BEAT BIG COAL ======================================
Brian Ward describes the battle to keep strip-mining off of Northern Cheyenne
land.
July 6, 2012
THE NORTHERN Cheyenne Indian Reservation in Southeastern Montana lies on one
of the richest coal deposits in North America.
The Northern Cheyenne are a nation of a little over 4,000 people. The
reservation itself was founded in resistance [1]. This resistance continued
in the 1960s and 1980s to prevent the destruction of their land by coal
companies.
In 1966, the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) urged the Northern Cheyenne's
Tribal Council to lease out as much of the reservation as possible for coal
extraction. At first, this seemed like a good prospect for the Northern
Cheyenne, who faced extreme poverty on the reservation.
The Peabody Coal Company received a permit to explore 94,000 acres of
Northern Cheyenne Reservation. In exchange, Peabody was to pay the nation
17.5 cents for every ton of coal shipped off the reservations and 15 cents
for every ton consumed by the reservation.
This agreement made the BIA happy, and they continued to sell exploration
permits. By 1971, five of the biggest energy companies had leases and leasing
rights on over half of the entire Northern Cheyenne reservation.
That same year, the U.S. Department of the Interior released the North
Central Power Study, which proposed stripping billions of tons of coal from
reserves in Montana, North Dakota, Wyoming and elsewhere in the Northern
Plains, building "mine-mouth" generating power plants next to the mines, and
creating a network to supply energy around the country.
"We just didn't know what we were doing," said a tribal council member. "We
wanted money for the nation. We didn't know what the coal companies were
planning to do, and they sure didn't tell us."
The BIA deliberately misled the nation in order to benefit the energy
companies. Consol Energy was going to set up four plants on the reservation.
It claimed that it was going to build a health center and that the nation
would be millionaires with the royalties.
"But even if we are poor, I think I would rather be poor in my own country,
with my own people, with my own way of life than be rich in a torn-up land
where I am outnumbered 10 to one by strangers," said Ted Risingsun, a
Northern Cheyenne, in response to the growing expansion of coal permits.
Author Brent Ashabranner made a parallel with what had happened to their
ancestors:
>There was a terrible symmetry between what had happened to their forefathers
>100 years ago and what was happening to them now. Then the white man had
>wanted their land for farms and ranches and for the gold beneath the Dakota
>Black Hills. The government had sent the army cavalry to drive them off the
>land.
>
>This time, a century later, it was coal that the white man wanted. This
>time, it was not ranchers and farmers and prospectors who came, but
>well-dressed businessmen and lawyers. This time, the government could not
>send the army, for the Cheyenne was legal in the form of Bureau of Indian
>Affairs, could help the businessmen, and it did.
>
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
GEORGE CROSSLAND, a lawyer who used to work for the BIA, quit and came to
help the Northern Cheyenne. He discovered that no study had been completed
about the effects of strip-mining on the land, environment and culture of the
Northern Cheyenne. According to code, the BIA was required to do this. In
addition, coal-mining leases and permits on Indian lands must not exceed
2,560 acres.
With this information, the Northern Cheyenne could petition the Department of
Interior to cancel the agreements, on the grounds that the BIA had not
carried out its duties as trustee of Indian lands--which to be honest they
never had. On March 5, 1973, the Tribal Council voted 11 to 0 to ask the
interior secretary to cancel all Northern Cheyenne coal leases and
exploration permits.
As Ted Risingsun said:
>They couldn't believe that our land and environment and culture meant more
>to us than a stack of dollars. They couldn't believe it even when we turned
>down the Consol offer. But we wanted those agreements cancelled. Period.
>That petition was sort of a Cheyenne Declaration of Independence.
>
At first, the Interior Secretary didn't cancel the leases, and instead said
that the nation and companies had to come to an agreement before mining could
occur. This was a mini-win for Cheyenne land, but not for sovereignty, so the
fight continued.
The coal companies continued to push and tried to prove themselves by saying
that the land could be "reclaimed"--meaning put back together. Obviously,
this was just one of their schemes to make sure the contacts didn't get
canceled. The companies immediately tried to build power plants surrounding
the reservation in Colstrip, Mont., 12 miles north of the reservation. The
stripping of coal around the area increased to 20 million tons each year.
Looking to build a large base to fight strip-mining both on the reservation
and in the surrounding area, the Northern Cheyenne reached out to local
ranchers and environmentalists, who were also worried about the building of
power plants in Colstrip.
The next step of action was to appeal for Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) protection under the Clean Air Act. The argument was that pure air was
part of the Cheyenne heritage, as much a part of the life they had chosen to
live as the clear sky above them and pine-clad hills around them. The EPA
responded quickly and gave protection to the reservation.
However, in 1978, it looked like the EPA was going to approve Montana Power
Group's request to building two more power plants in Colstrip. But since a
study showed that these plants would affect the air quality of the Northern
Cheyenne, they didn't issue the permits to Montana Power.
Montana Power's executive vice president said, "We've already spent $130
million getting ready to build them, and they are so badly needed that we do
not intend to stop now." This showed that the coal companies had no regard
for the law and used the energy crisis to gain more profit despite the effort
it would have on the Northern Cheyenne and the surrounding white ranchers.
They kept on pushing the EPA, and the agency said it would grant the permits
if the company installed "more effective pollution control equipment."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
THE LAST resort for the Tribal Council at this point was to try to get a bill
passed by Congress canceling the coal leases and permits.
Moving forward on this front, it became even clearer that the BIA was in bed
with the coal companies. In response, the BIA stated, "We believe this
measure is both unjustified and unnecessary and would set a bad precedent for
future similar situation that may arise."
Obviously, the BIA was right--if the bill succeeded, it would empower nations
to claim sovereignty, declare independence from the U.S. and successfully
fight back. The nation's success could inspire nations all over North
America.
A bill was introduced in Congress in March 1980, and hearings were held in
Billings, Mont. Allen Rowland, the lawyer for the Northern Cheyenne, said,
"We think that each company would recognize that any rights to develop coal
on the Northern Cheyenne reservation are, in fact meaningless unless
enthusiastically supported by the Northern Cheyenne people as a whole."
He continued:
>It is now absolutely clear that no such support exists for these
>transactions. During the initial stages of our struggle against these
>transaction, and, indeed, for several years thereafter, many governmental
>and industry people believed that the real purpose of the nation's effort
>was to extract large monetary payments from the coal companies through a
>forced renegotiation.
>
>However, for some time now, that cynical view has been discredited. It is no
>recognized that the nation has acted pursuant to its own sense of duty and
>honor, the duty to protect and preserve the Northern Cheyenne reservation as
>a homeland for the Northern Cheyenne people.
>
The bill to cancel the coal leases and permits was passed by Congress and
signed by President Jimmy Carter on October 9, 1980. In response, the
Northern Cheyenne would say, "Our air was pure and the sun had not turned
black." Wally McRae, a white rancher said, "We should thank the Indians."
The Northern Cheyenne showed great reliance against the U.S. government and
their corporate partners. However, this resistance did not happen in a
vacuum. At the same time, movements were growing for Black Power, Red Power,
against the Vietnam War, for women's rights and the environment, and many
people were radicalizing around the country.
It was in this climate that a nation of 4,000 people were able to organize
with white ranchers and environmentalists to prevent the destruction of their
land.
To this day, coal companies are still trying their best to mine in the area,
and the Northern Cheyenne continue to resist. This story shows us what is
possible when people fight back.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Published by the International Socialist Organization. Material on this Web
site is licensed by SocialistWorker.org, under a Creative Commons (by-nc-nd
3.0) license, except for articles that are republished with permission.
Readers are welcome to share and use material belonging to this site for
non-commercial purposes, as long as they are attributed to the author and
SocialistWorker.org.
[1] http://socialistworker.org/2012/02/13/the-cheyenne-resistance
