Subject: [SocialistWorker.org] The power of struggle
-----
View original article here:
http://socialistworker.org/2012/10/11/power-of-struggle
Editorials
======== THE POWER OF STRUGGLE ===============================================
The teachers' strike was the polar opposite of what passes for "politics" in
the U.S.
October 11, 2012
THE CHICAGO Teachers Union (CTU) put the power of struggle back on the table
after their nine-day strike won against politicians and education officials
who tried to vilify them.
Rank-and-file union members were united, determined and active in standing up
to the offensive against teachers and public education that has swept through
cities around the country, leaving behind privatization and hamstrung unions.
Instead, the Chicago teachers fought back, and they convinced a strong
majority of Chicagoans to support them.
Their contract isn't perfect, and the stage has been set for new struggles to
come. But in the face of a decades-old assault on unions and workers, the
teachers scored a tremendous victory in holding the line and more against
Rahm Emanuel and the corporate school deformers.
Now we are seeing the consequences of that victory. Many workers across the
country were watching the CTU, and the strike inspired them--and reshaped, to
greater and lesser extents, how they view their own struggles.
In a few places, the teachers' strike begat more teachers' strikes. A few
weeks after the CTU suspended its walkout, teachers in the Chicago suburb of
Evergreen Park hit the picket line. "I think [Chicago teachers] let us know
we can do this," Melissa Rehfield, an aide at Northeast School, told the
/Southtown Star/. While the CTU strike was underway, teachers in Lake Forest,
north of Chicago, also walked out.
Workers outside the schools also took inspiration from the CTU strike. In
Elwood, Ill., warehouse workers went on strike against Wal-Mart after the
company retaliated against workers who were protesting dangerous working
conditions and non-payment of overtime. The small group of three dozen
strikers found enthusiastic support at the mass rallies in support of the
teachers. The Wal-Mart workers won the principal demand of their 21-day
strike and returned their jobs--with full pay for the time they were out.
And for those who didn't go on strike, the CTU strike had an effect in
presenting a new way to address the drive for austerity and cutbacks gripping
states and cities around the country. The Chicago teachers showed the
alternative: Don't accept concessions and belt-tightening as the only
"realistic" course, but draw a line in the sand and organize to fight back.
There is no guarantee that this victory will be followed by more of the
same--no doubt our side will face setbacks in the future as we try to turn
the tide. But we can say now that the CTU strike represents a sharp departure
from business as usual for the labor movement. The CTU organized its members
for a fight; it reached out to the working class as a whole for support; it
challenged a national leader of the Democratic Party; and it won.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
WHAT LESSONS should labor and other activists take away from the teachers'
strike?
First of all, that union members were engaged at every step in the struggle.
Preparations for the strike began more than two years before when the Caucus
of Rank-and-File Educators won a sweeping victory in local elections and took
over the top positions of the union. The new CTU leaders began systematically
building strong leaders in every school in every part of the city.
That grassroots strength showed itself last spring when CTU members stunned
Emanuel with a 90 percent strike authorization vote. In fact, among teachers
who cast ballots, an incredible 98 percent supported authorizing a walkout.
As a strike appeared increasingly inevitable, union members were active with
informational pickets at schools and events around the city to raise
awareness of the issues.
During the strike itself, virtually every union member was involved every
day--starting with morning pickets at schools around the city and continuing
at mass rallies and marches later in the day. When the city finally backed
off its all-or-nothing agenda and CTU leaders reached a tentative agreement,
the union's 800-strong House of Delegates decided to continue the strike into
a second week so every teacher could discuss and debate the contract.
Every development, before and during the strike, reflected the union's
commitment to democracy and grassroots empowerment. The lesson for all was:
Why can't every union operate this way? Why not the government, too?
The organization and mobilization of the whole union was a critical factor in
winning public support. The teachers didn't have big advertising dollars.
They didn't have lobbyists. They certainly didn't have the support of
political officials, their wealthy backers or the media.
What teachers did have--and what proved to be the deciding factor in this
fight--was solidarity.
The unity of the teachers won over many parents of Chicago Public schools
students, even though the strike posed difficulties in their personal life.
The CTU also devoted significant resources, from long before the walkout, to
reaching out to community organizations and other potential allies.
Last winter, the CTU was part of the fight--ultimately unsuccessful--to stop
the city from closing or "turning around" 17 schools, all of them on the
poorer and disproportionately Black and Latino West and South Sides. And
during the strike, the union continually focused attention on the broader
issues of education justice--even though state laws barred it from making
these the focus of the strike.
As a result, the teachers were seen by many parents and community activists
as allies in the struggle against what the CTU called in one report
"apartheid in Chicago schools."
As a result of all this, the teachers had strong majority public support for
a strike. This is no small matter. The scapegoating campaign against
public-sector workers, and teachers in particular, was supposed to have
turned public opinion permanently against any militant action by teachers'
unions.
Rahm Emanuel's arrogance during negotiations during the walkout no doubt
stemmed from his certainty that public support would be with him if the
teachers dared to strike. He and other political leaders believed that the
scapegoating campaign against public-sector workers, and teachers in
particular, had convinced most people that the teachers were selfish, and the
union cared only about its members.
But Rahm was wrong. From the beginning, a majority of Chicagoans said they
trusted the teachers far more than the city about schools. Two out of three
parents of Chicago school kids supported the CTU in their action--an
unprecedented sentiment in a citywide teachers' strike. Among Blacks and
Latinos, support for the union was even stronger.
Ultimately, the CTU succeeded in resurrecting the best traditions of the
labor movement: That a strike by a group of workers is part of the struggle
for working-class people in general--because an injury to one is an injury to
all, and a victory for one is a victory for all.
By striking, Chicago teachers provided an up-until-now missing voice in the
debate over the future of public education and the austerity drive in U.S.
cities and states. As historian Mark Naison said of the Chicago struggle,
"Nowhere else has a teachers' union said, 'Enough is enough.' This is ground
zero of resistance to corporate education reform."
Beyond the debate about school deform, the teachers began to shift the
national discussion about the recession and who should pay for it. The CTU
strike threw into question the accepted logic of rulers around the
world--that there is no other option than austerity for workers, while the
banks and big business continue to profit.
"The strike transformed the teachers from powerless to powerful" is how
former Republican education official-turned-school deform critic Diane
Ravitch--someone who knows a lot about transformation--described it.
John, a teacher at a South Side school in Chicago, put it another way:
>I've been a delegate for 11 years, but I've never seen anything like this.
>I've had some success in getting people involved, maybe to do some lobbying
>or advocacy, but the level of unity and participation in this is incredible.
>Sure, there are some things in the contract that I wish were better, but we
>can go back to work stronger and better prepared to organize and fight
>again.
>
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
THE TEACHERS' strike was the polar opposite of Election 2012 and what passes
for "politics" in the U.S.
With the Democrats and the Republicans defining the limits of mainstream
political debate, elections become about choosing between two candidates who
differ in their rhetoric and sometimes even on the details of their
proposals, but who share more in common when it comes to priorities and basic
policies.
This became clearer than ever during the Chicago teachers' strike, since the
union was going up against an all-Democratic city political establishment.
There was no difference at all between the two mainstream parties when it
came to the teachers' struggle--both were against it.
The Democratic "friends of labor" had nothing to offer labor during the
teachers' strike--in fact, they led the attack on one of the more important
remaining bastions of union power in the CTU. Yet we're told that people on
the left who take politics seriously have to vote for Obama and the Democrats
anyway, in order to avoid the "greater evil" from winning. It's hard to think
of anything /less/ serious than this.
In 1900, the Socialist leader Eugene Debs described how Democrats of the time
turned a blind eye to plight of workers, like a strike of Coeur d'Alene,
Idaho, miners crushed by federal troops:
>We hear it frequently urged that the Democratic Party is the "poor man's
>party," "the friend of labor."...If the Democratic Party is the "friend of
>labor" any more than the Republican Party, why is its platform dumb in the
>presence of Coeur d'Alene? It knows the truth about these shocking
>outrages--crimes upon workingmen, their wives and children, which would
>blacken the pages of Siberia--why does it not speak out?
>
We're taught that the important decisions in society are made by the
experts--the government officials, their advisers, their corporate
think-tanks. The job of ordinary people is to vote for the person they
believe will best represent them--and it ends there.
The Chicago teachers' strike--like many labor battles before it throughout
U.S. history--provided a different vision of what "politics" should be: Not a
phony debate among elite candidates or an expensive attack ad, but ordinary
people discussing, organizing and mobilizing at the grassroots so they can
become a force powerful enough to turn their beliefs and demands into
reality.
This is real politics for socialists--the politics of class struggle--and
it's where social change comes from.
We also know that our side faces many challenges in the struggle to come.
It's time to apply the lessons of the Chicago teachers' strike to those
fights--in our unions, our workplaces, our schools and our neighborhoods.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Published by the International Socialist Organization. Material on this Web
site is licensed by SocialistWorker.org, under a Creative Commons (by-nc-nd
3.0) license, except for articles that are republished with permission.
Readers are welcome to share and use material belonging to this site for
non-commercial purposes, as long as they are attributed to the author and
SocialistWorker.org.
