The clock runs out on racism
It's an outrage that a National Football League team is named after a racial slur.
IT'S AN awkward fact of life in Washington, D.C., that we are home to both the Smithsonian's National Museum of the American Indian and the Washington Redskins. One attempts to preserve the Native American cultures that weren't eradicated by conquest; the other is both a symbol and result of the same eradication.
Dave Zirin is the coauthor, with John Carlos, of The John Carlos Story, and author of Bad Sports: How Owners Are Ruining the Games We Love and A People's History of Sports in the United States, as well as two collections of his sports writings, Welcome to the Terrordome: The Pain, Politics and Promise of Sports and What's My Name, Fool? Sports and Resistance in the United States. He is a columnist for TheNation.com; his writings are also featured at his Edge of Sports Web site.
These two worlds collided this past week when the museum hosted a daylong symposium about Native American sports nicknames. In a packed auditorium, panelists and audience members took the local team to task, calling their name "ugly," "offensive" and "a racist slur."
Former Colorado Sen. Ben Nighthorse Campbell, the only Native American senator in U.S. history, said from the stage, "If you want [your mascot] to be a savage, use your own picture." Not one person either in the audience or the crowd defended the use of "Redskin," because, as one fan of the team said to me, "it really is defending the indefensible."
Despite repeated requests from the museum, the Redskins refused to send anyone to make the case publicly that the name is anything other than a self-evident slur. Like their owner, the ham-fisted, rabbit-eared Dan Snyder, they celebrate the moniker only when no one is present to challenge them. Since purchasing the franchise in 1999, Snyder has maintained that the name "Redskins" was a "tribute," as former team Vice President Karl Swanson said, "derived from the Native American tradition for warriors to daub their bodies with red clay before battle."
This is not an argument they felt confident making at the Smithsonian because the laughter would have cracked the Capitol dome. The team name was the brainchild not of an anthropologist who advised on the fierce honor of the "red-clay warriors," but of team founder, segregationist and Dixiecrat George Preston Marshall.
Campbell said that he asks people, "How would you feel if the team was called the Washington Darkies?" George Preston Marshall would have felt euphoric because he adored minstrel shows and fetishized the Confederacy. As Thomas G. Smith wrote in his book Showdown: JFK and the Integration of the Washington Redskins, when Marshall proposed marriage to his future wife Corrine, he did so "amidst fragrant honeysuckle while a group of African American performers [dressed like house-slave extras from Gone with the Wind] sang 'Carry Me Back to Old Virginny,'" a song that speaks lovingly of how slaves love to see affection between their "Massa and Missus."
The Redskins were named for the minstrelsy Marshall adored and, as the southernmost team in the league at the time, to appeal to Dixie. They were also--surprise, surprise--the last team in the NFL to integrate.
If you know this background, it's risible to hear NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell say, "I think Dan Snyder and the organization have made it very clear that they are proud of that name and that heritage, and I think the fans are, too."
There is nothing to be proud of in this "heritage," unless your tastes tend toward the antebellum South. In a league that's 70 percent African-American, yet couldn't seem to find any coaches or executives of color to hire this off-season, the Redskins are also a reminder that, as William Faulkner wrote, "The past is never dead. It's not even past."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
DESPITE THIS awful, seemingly entrenched history, there is change on the immediate horizon in the face and play of the team's star quarterback, Robert Griffin III. RGIII hasn't said a word about the team's name, but his very presence represents the greatest threat to Marshall's legacy.
Griffin is recovering from knee surgery after the finest statistical season of any rookie quarterback in the history of the game. The team won their division and, with the mercury-quick Griffin under center, also became must-see TV. Beyond just the swooning local sports writers, D.C. figures like Maureen Dowd, Marco Rubio and President Obama all giggled with glee in RGIII's glow.
If the 23-year-old wonder said tomorrow that the team should be called the Washington Cuddly Snuggles, it would happen. But even if RGIII never says a thing, the better this team gets and the closer they come to the Super Bowl, the more this name goes from a quietly uttered embarrassment to a full-blown national conversation.
Do you think the NFL and Roger Goodell--on top of answering questions about concussions, lawsuits and the dwindling number of Black coaches--want to talk about anti-Native racism?
Even if Dan Snyder doesn't want it to happen, it's going to happen. As former Redskin Tre Johnson said, "It's an ethnically insensitive moniker that offends an entire race of displaced people. That should be reason enough to change it." It should be, but if you know Dan Snyder, you know it will take more.
Maybe an RGIII shall lead us. Or maybe, as Curtis Mayfield advised about the very civil rights movement George Preston Marshall so vehemently opposed, we're just going to have to "keep on pushin'." Either way, you might want to put your new RGIII jersey in mothballs, because in the future, the only place you'll find Redskins gear will be behind glass--maybe at an exhibit at the National Museum of the American Indian.
First published at TheNation.com.